
A single global price for carbon emissions is not likely for another 10 to 15 years because governments are dragging their heels on legislation and there are still many hurdles to jump. The European Union's executive Commission hopes to have a global carbon market in which emissions trading schemes are linked by 2020. It wants to see national schemes in all OECD countries by 2013 and for those to be linked by 2015.
However, the recent meltdown of the carbon market in Europe has highlighted the inherent instability in the system and also hampered green investment, because as long as the price of carbon remains low, industry will remain shortsighted, and not invest the necessary resources over the medium to long -term.
Meanwhile the U.S. cap-and-trade bill is being negotiated with carbon permit auctions by the government expected to start from 2013. In his latest budget proposals, U.S. President Barack Obama expects to generate some $646 billion in revenues from these auctions between 2013 and 2020. Obama's plans have so far had no major impact on carbon trading in Europe, but in the long term it is highly probable these two markets will join up creating a vast pool of liquidity.
Price expectations under a U.S. scheme are fundamentally different to what you expect for the EU. European prices will likely be higher, so if the schemes were linked by 2015, that would mean a one-way flow of (carbon permits) from the U.S. to Europe.
Some believe this will create the largest derivatives market in the word, as it is projected that the market could read $1 trillion in trades annually by 2020, according to New Carbon Finance, a London research firm. Proper regulation of a U.S. carbon market is particularly important given what’s happened in financial markets over the last year.
Wall Street banks, hedge funds and institutional investors are under a rain of public indignation and regulatory scrutiny for their role in the current financial crisis. Many legislators are concerned that creating a carbon market may simply give the same players a new opportunity for manipulation and hazardous trading.
At the same time, those institutional investors argue their activities help to provide liquidity to the market - enough trading activity that helps both to define a price and give buyers and sellers of emission allowances multiple participants with whom to trade.
Just as sketchy home mortgages set the stage for the subprime mess in U.S. banking markets, sketchy environmental initiatives threaten to create a “subprime carbon” mess, environmental group Friends of the Earth warned last Thursday. A cap-and-trade plan would create a huge new market in emissions permits at a time when Wall Street and Washington have their hands full figuring out how to police existing markets. One key element in all the climate proposals floated so far is the use of “offsets,” or the ability to purchase emissions reductions made somewhere else, which Friends of the Earth call in a new report, “Subprime Carbon”.
Strict fool-proof regulation will be essential to ensure derivatives do not ruin the carbon market as they have others.